How Many Tango Recordings Are There? Stories on the history of tango music

I have been recently going through the process of structuring my tango library as part of learning to DJ. While working through the orchestras, I became curious about what I thought would be a straightforward question.  ‘How many tango recordings are there?’ What I thought would be a simple google search whose answer would fill a quick page turned into a couple month journey into the history of tango music, the history of the recording industry, and the history of Argentina and the world. Luckily, this rabbit hole I fell down is filled with Chessire Cats, Mad Hatters, and interesting adventures which I have tried my best to convey here.

The following sections turned out to be much longer than originally planned, though is still much shorter than each of the stories deserve. In each section, I try to answer a question that came up during my attempt to answer the original question. In total, it tells a story about the songs we listen to and dance to each night at the milonga.  

What is the First Tango?

If there are a total number of tangos, then there has to be a first. But tango music evolved organically from many influences, so there is no clear cutoff where we can say before is not tango and after is tango. A question we can try to definitively answer, though, is “what is the first tango recording that we can listen to today?”

he oldest surviving recording of any song is this banger 😉 recorded in 1860 by Édouard-Léon Scott de Martinville, using a phonautograph to transcribe audio onto paper.

It took a little while for the song to become a hit, with researchers at Berkeley using optical imaging to fist play it back in 2008 [1].

Therefore, real birth year of audio recording is with Thomas Edison’s invention of the Phonograph in 1877. Sounds were engraved onto a tinfoil (and later wax) cylinder which could then be played back. Ten years later, in 1887, Emile Berliner patented the Gramophone which allowed for the much more practical recording onto flat disks. While Berliner’s original company did not pan out, his patent rights got passed on to his partner Eldridge Johnson who founded the Consolidated Talking Machine Company, which in 1901 changed its name to the Victor Talking Machine Company [2]. Victor and RCA, the radio and electronics company Victor merged with in 1929, produced more tango records than any other label. If you ever see an old tango record, or if you use a program such as Virtual DJ which displays the record label, then you are certain to see the Victor and RCA logos.

Patent for the original Grammaphone. Image from https://patents.google.com/patent/US372786

As far I can tell, none of the few phonograph cylinders whose sounds have been digitized contain tango songs [3]. And many of the earliest recorded disks have been lost to time. The oldest surviving tango recordings may be held by the TangoVia Buenos Aires project, started by the renowned tango bassist Ignacio Varchausky, which states they have a tango recording from 1902 [4][5]. It did not seem that this recording had been digitized and made available, however.

1905 Choclo from Orquestra Argentina Victor.

After a fair amount of searching, the oldest recording of a tango song that I could find available online to listen to is this 1905 recording of El Choclo by the Victor Argentine Orchestra.


So, How Many Tango Recordings Are There?

Websites such as Tango-DJ.at, Tango Time Travel, Tango.Info, and El Recodo Tango provide a number of tango artist discographies. To estimate the number of tango recordings I used tango songs from the El Recodo tango collection because their data were convenient to process did not have too many duplicates. The first recordings in this list were from 1912 and the final were from 2024.

Golden age artists appear to have a close to complete representation in the dataset, but more recent tango artists were under-represented. I therefore used a cutoff date for the analysis to consider ‘historical’ tango songs. The cutoff that seems most appropriate is 1995, when the analog era of recording ended in Argentina. After cleaning the data and dropping duplicate entries, the data set includes 11,839 available tango songs recorded between 1912 to 1995. Given additional songs before 1912 along with missing entries, we can give a rough estimate of there being approximately 12 thousand historical tango recordings. This tracks El Recodo’s own estimates of the number of tango records[6]. Adding an additional 700 Milongas and 1330 Valses brings the total list to around 14 thousand songs.

When Were They Recorded?

Tango orchestras and tango recordings by year. Data from El Recodo Tango

The figure above displays the number of tango orchestras and recorded tangos each year. Early audio recordings used the acoustic energy of the sound itself to power the stylus to record the sound on wax disk (The video on the right provides a good description of the acoustic recording process and the transition to electronic recording techniques).

While acoustic recording methods became quite sophisticated, the technology was limited in what sounds could be captured. Soft sounds, low frequencies, and high frequencies would all be lost in the recording process. Modern audio files generally have a frequency range of 20 Hz to 20,000 Hz and early electronic recordings had a frequency range of approximately 50 Hz to 6,000 Hz. Acoustic recordings, meanwhile, only had a range of 200 to 2,400 Hz [7].

In the early 1920’s researchers Henry Harrison and Joseph Maxfield at Bell Labs developed electrical microphones, amplifiers and electromechanical recorders which greatly improved the process of recording sound (You can read about the process in their own words here). In February 1925 Art Gillham and His Southland Syncopators recorded You May Be Lonesome, the first electrically recorded song. One year later, March 1st, 1926, electrical recording made its way to Argentina with Rosita Quiroga’s La Musa Mistonga.

La Musa Mistonga by Rosita Quiroga, 1926. The first electrically recorded tango.

Interestingly, the studios slow-rolled the new technology into Argentina with minimal marketing or fanfare to not be stuck with a large stockpile of now inferior quality acoustic records. For example, instead of the usual publicity that would follow such an improvement, the only change Victor made to denote that a new record was recorded electrically was to add a VE to denote Victor Electrical [8].  

Acoustic recording session
Electric recording session
1925 Acoustic recording by Julio de Caro
1926 Electric recording of Fuiste by Julio de Caro. Note the VE at the top

Listen to Julio de Caro’s 1925 acoustical recording of Alma De Bohemio and compare with his electrically recorded Fuiste just one year later. His 1928 recording of Ojos Brujos further shows how much the recording technology improved in just a few short years. But to get the full scope of the change in sound quality from the start of tango recordings to the start of Tango’s Golden Age, listen to the difference between Carlos Gardel’s 1912 La Mariposa, and Gardel’s Volver recorded March of 1935; just three months before his death on June 24th.

Gardel 1912 La Mariposa
Gardel 1935 Volver

Because of the lower audio quality of acoustic recordings, the music we hear at the milonga is all from 1926 onward.  

What is That Big Spike in the 1920’s?

What stands out most in the figure of recordings by year is the spike in songs from 1927-1930. What happened?  

At the same time electrical microphones were revolutionizing the recording industry, advances in radio technology were revolutionizing the ability to transmit and receive signals [9]. Radio allowed an artist to reach millions of homes at once, enabling international superstars to emerge. Radio was also the OG streaming service, allowing people to listen to music without having to buy records. Facing declining sales, the record companies looked to expand their offerings to reach new audiences [10]. Add to this the post-war prosperity that marked the roaring 20’s.

The 20’s were ripe for big changes in music. To draw corollaries to music in the US at the time: Blind Lemon Jeffries recorded Matchbox Blues March 1927; Duke Ellington recorded East St. Louis Toodle-Oo, his first record to reach the charts, March 1927; The Carter Family recorded their first tracks August, 1927; Jimmy Rogers recorded his first tracks August, 1927; and Louis Armstrong recorded West End Blues June 1928. The foundations of Blues, American Folk, Country, and Jazz were all set in a few short years in the latter half of the 1920s.

Facing near-insatiable demand for music from records and radio stations, composer and band leader Francisco Canaro said, ‘hold my mate’. Canaro recorded 372 songs (325 tangos) in 1927, 344 songs (293 tangos) in 1928, 421 songs (275 tangos) in 1929, and 421 songs (221 tangos) in 1930 [11]. This is more than a song a day consistently for four years! His band recorded 16 songs in one particularly prolific session on December 12th, 1930. A significant fraction of the spike in the late 1920’s in tango recordings can be attributed to Canaro’s productivity during this period.

Who Recorded the Most?

ArtistTangos RecordedFirst RecordingFinal RecordingRecording Lifespan
Francisco Canaro1,5841915197358
Juan D’Arienzo8241928197547
Carlos Gardel6031912193523
Osvaldo Fresedo5031926198054
Osvaldo Pugliese4271943198643
Francisco Lomuto3991925195025
Aníbal Troilo3841938197133
Roberto Firpo3841917194427
Alfredo De Angelis3641943198542
Carlos Di Sarli3561928196032

The table above shows the ten orchestras who recorded the most songs. In total, the top ten account for about half of all of the tango recordings. While volume is not necessarily an indicator of influence or quality, this list is a decent place to start for anyone newer to tango who wants to know who to start listening to.  Unsurprisingly, Canaro was the most prolific, accounting for 13% of all tangos recorded, but the other artists on the list were no slouches either. The ‘King of the Beat’, Juan D’Arienzo comes in a strong second. And given his orchestra’s proclivity for faster tempos and ending variations, he likely comes fairly close to Canaro on a ‘total recorded notes’ basis.

What are the Most Recorded Songs?

There are a few tango classics that get recorded and played repeatedly throughout the decades. As a tango dancer, becoming familiar with these tango evergreens can go a long way to improving your musicality. The table below provides 25 of the most recorded tango songs along with selected examples for each. I choose examples that would highlight a range of tango artists and eras along with providing examples of how individual artists evolved their style throughout the years (You can also listen to them on this Spotify playlist).

PositionTitleRecordingsExample 1Example 2
1La Cumparsita100Troilo’43D’Arienzo ‘63
2El Choclo34Di Sarli ‘54Tipica Victor ‘29
3A Media Luz33Donato ‘41Di Angelis’56
4Rodríguez Peña33Carabelli ‘32Di Sarli ‘56
5Caminito29Gardel ‘27Lomuto ‘35
6El Amanecer27Firpo ‘28Di Sarli ‘41
7Sentimiento Gaucho27Miranda ‘63Falcón ‘30
8Derecho Viejo26Fresedo ‘41D’Arienzo ‘48
9El Entrerriano26Biagi ‘41Salgán ‘63
10Ojos Negros25Sassone ‘74Canaro ‘32
11Chiqué24Pugliese ‘53Francini-Pontier ‘53  
12Yira Yira24Troilo – Rivero ‘47Gardel ‘30
13Don Juan23D’Arienzo ‘36D’Arienzo ‘50
14A La Gran Muñeca22Di Sarli ‘45Di Sarli ‘54
15Adiós Muchachos22OTV ‘27Rodriguez ‘45
16Adiós Pampa Mía22Troilo ‘45Tanturi – Castillo ‘47
17Felicia22Carabelli ‘32D’Arienzo ‘39
18Inspiración22Troilo ‘47Maderna ‘50
19El Once21Fresedo ‘27Fresedo ‘53
20Quejas De Bandoneón21Troilo ‘58Piazzola ‘47
21Canaro En París20Canaro ‘27Quintetto Real (Salgán) ‘60
22Recuerdo20Pugliese ‘44Pugliese ‘85
23Uno20Pontier – Goyenche ‘68Fresedo – Serpa ‘43
24Alma De Bohemio19Laurenz – Podestá ‘43Tanturi – Ribo ‘47
25Mano a Mano19Canaro ‘27Díaz ‘75
Table of the 25 most recorded tango songs along with examples of each.

In terms of number of recordings, the winner by a mile (winner by 1.6 kilometers in Argentina) is La Cumparsita. First recorded by Roberto Firpo in 1917, La Cumparsita has gone on to become the most recognized and recorded tango. A story shared to me by my friend Ragnar is that one of D’Arienzo’s versions of La Cumparsita became such a hit that audiences wouldn’t let the band leave until they played it. Hence the tradition of ending the night with La Cumparsita.

While the milonga may end with La Cumparsita, D’Arienzo tried to ensure record sales from this hit never would. His orchestra recorded no less than seven versions of the song, the first in 1928 and the final in 1971, selling more than 14 million copies of the song in total[12]. These varying versions provide an insightful timeline into how tango music evolved throughout the decades. You can hear similar differences in D’Arienzo’s Don Juan from 1936 and 1950, or Di Sarli’s 1945 and 1954 versions of A La Gran Muñeca. The various versions of El Once by Osvaldo Fresedo provide an especially vivid timeline, with recordings in 1927, ’31, ’35, ’45, ’53, and ’71.

In general, what I will call the ‘size’ of the song tended to increase over time. ‘Size’ of song is not a musical term (discussing things like composition, volume, tempo changes, and dynamic range would be more accurate), but it is certainly something we feel as dancers. Some songs naturally ask for bigger steps, more complex movements, and more changes in dynamics than others. I believe this is part of why so many dancers prefer dancing to tangos from the 1930s and ‘40s. In this period, the songs are ‘big enough’ to call for interesting movements and maintain interest for a full night, but also ‘small enough’ to fit into a crowded milonga and not tire yourself out after just a few tandas. It is also interesting that the upper end of eras for milongas is the lower end for stage performances. Most songs in the milonga are from the 30’s to early 50’s, whereas songs chosen for tango stage performances are often from the mid 50’s onwards.

How Come Many DJs have More Than 12 thousand Tango Records?

I said the estimated number of tango recordings before 1995 is around 12,000 (14,000 if we include Vals and Milonga). But I know a few DJs and music collectors whose personal libraries have 50 thousand recordings or more. And the Tango-DJ.AT states that they have data on 105,000 tango recordings![13] How can I tell you there are 12 thousand tangos when I personally know of people with tango libraries five times that size? There is a story worth telling here.

The story I am about to tell could have been taken straight from the script for a Marvel movie. It has it all—secret Nazi technology, a millionaire media icon and entrepreneur, shady corporations, political machinations, and an eclectic group of superheroes banding together to save the day.

By the beginning of tango’s golden age, recording technology had already started to become dated. Recordings were lathed directly onto a lacquer disk, meaning you had one take to get the recording right with no way to edit. The actual records were made from shellac, which is a resin secreted from the Lac bug. As you can see in this video, the whole process was complex, expensive, and required a lot of expertise and equipment (if you are like me and have a strange curiosity for old-timey industrial processes, then the video is pure gold).


Image from https://pspatialaudio.com/manufacture_records.htm
Note: for vinyl records, the mother-master is called a mould.

As incredible as it is that millions of people were able to enjoy recorded music for decades because of resin from a small bug, shellac is not the ideal material for audio. Shellac records are relatively big, 10-12 inches in diameter, brittle, you drop one and it shatters, and the grooves could not be cut too fine so each shellac could only hold one song per side. They are also expensive to produce, transport, and store, and the sound quality degrades with each play.

Companies were hard at work researching technology for recording and storing sound when World War II broke out. While the war put much of the research on hold, Allied signal operators started hearing something strange coming out of Germany. Things like radio broadcasts of Hitler from two places at the same time, or symphony orchestras playing from concert halls that had already been destroyed in bombing raids. The broadcasts had to be recordings but sounded as if they were live and were much longer than could be stored on Shellac. Here you can hear the superb sound quality compared to other 1944 recordings. In fact, the sound quality is so high in fact that you can actually hear the sound of the allied bombing in the background during the quieter moments (listen starting around 5:30).

Allegro from Concerto for piano and orchestra No.5 – Gieseking/RO Berlin.
Audio from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EY7lvuVjjX4

As the war was coming to an end, US Signal Corps officer Jack Mullin went on a quest to discover the new Nazi recording technology. What he finally found was high-fidelity ‘Magnetophon’ tape recorders. Mullen had one a few of these devices along with 50 reels of tape shipped back to his home in San Francisco and began working on them over the next two years[14].

Once Mullen felt he had mastered the technology, he went out looking for investors. Luckily for Mullen, Harry Lillis “Bing” Crosby Jr. was fed up with his work. Radio shows would do two live broadcasts three hours apart, one each for the East Coast and West Coast audiences.


Magnetophon tape recorder discovered at a German-controlled radio station in 1945. Image from https://blogs.telosalliance.com/the-history-of-magnetic-recording-tape

With this schedule, Crosby was working himself ragged and missing a lot of dinners with his family. He also couldn’t go back and fix errors or take out sections before the broadcast was sent out.

When he heard about Mullen’s recording tape he immediately scheduled a meeting. Crosby invested $50k (about $500k in today’s dollars) in the Ampex company to work with Mullen to make the Reel-to-Reel tape recorder. By 1948 Bing was recording and editing his show on magnetic tape.

Around the same time as magnetic tape, record companies began coming out with new vinyl records. These were cheaper, sturdier, could hold higher fidelity, and could hold more music for the same amount of space. This 1954 video, made by the RCA company, shows the process of recording and producing vinyl. Given what occurs 10 years later, it also has the unfortunate quote “The original tape goes into the vault for safe keeping, to take its place forever alongside many other priceless performances by the world’s greatest artists.”

Magnetic tape and vinyl opened a new world of economic opportunities. Costs and production capacity are based on the number disks produced, so vinyl storing 3-6 times the number of songs per disk means production and transport costs are reduced and production capacity of songs are increased. Magnetic tape meant that a song could be recorded in a separate location from where the lacquer master was cut.

Newer record labels could record onto tape and then have the tape shipped off to a separate facility to be turned into vinyl, increasing the number of record labels recording tango in the 50s. In 1951, the first tangos recorded with tape and vinyl were by Carlos Di Sarli in 1951 with the new recording company Music-Hall [15]. Many of my personal favorite tango recordings are from the 50s—those crystal-clear songs DJs play later in the milonga were you fall in love with your partner by the end of the tanda.

Image from http://jens-ingo.all2all.org/archives/2776

The party started coming to an end with the exile of Perón by military coup in 1955. While coups were standard operating procedure for Argentina, which had 6 between 1930 and 1983, this coup was especially disruptive. The new military regime banned and censored tangos they deemed too close to “peronismo” and imprisoned a number of artists who were seen as supportive of the previous regime [16]. They prohibited gatherings in the street of three or more people and imposed a mandatory curfew. They cracked down especially hard on milongas compared to other dance venues and nightclubs. While tango music continued strong, the decimation of dance venues severed the ties between the music and the dance. By the 1960’s, both the number of tango dancers and the number of tango orchestras were in steep decline.

The 60’s dealt another devastating blow to tango. Public tastes were shifting towards a new wave of music, and record companies were facing increasing competition. A number of independent labels such as Music-Hall, who recorded the first vinyl in Argentina, had already gone bankrupt, spreading their original masters and collections to the wind. For the remaining companies, all of those old metal-masters from the shellac era were taking up a lot of space and storage costs. They were also starting to look pretty dated. After all, people weren’t making or buying shellac now that there was vinyl, so the recordings would have to be transferred anyways if they ever were to be reproduced.

In 1964, the Argentina branch of RCA decided to clear out its old warehouse of metal masters to create space for new business opportunities. It set up to transfer the masters to metal tape before destroying the old masters, but this transfer process was done in a haphazard manner. Only a portion of the masters were transferred and many of these done with limited quality control [17]. The same happened to a lessor extent with the other record labels resulting in many of the original tango masters being lost forever.

Lest you think this is tragedy confined to tango, an equally wholesale destruction of cultural heritage occurred by RCA around the same time less than an hour drive from my home. In the early 1960s, RCA deemed that its Camden New Jersey warehouse, which stored more than 300,000 disks of Victor recordings made from 1900 to 1945, would best serve the company by being dynamited to allow the rubble to be pushed into the waterfront to build a shipping dock on top of [18]. Most of the blues and jazz masters, classical recordings from the greats like Rachmaninoff [19], and recordings from artists such as Elvis Presley [20] all went up in smoke. Before the destruction, employees and a few collectors were allowed to go through the collection and take what they could carry. This must have been a surreal experience to have nearly 50 years of musical heritage in front of you and can only save what fits in your bag.  

The advent of compact discs in the 1980’s, along with renewed interest in tango dancing, brought a growing interest in golden age tango recordings. The new CD format made it much more convenient to ship collections of music to customers all around the world. But what to do now that many of the original recordings were destroyed? Some of the songs had already been released as LP compilations in the 60’s but were often sped up and had reverb and echo added. When no master remained and no LP existed, employees went out to collect old records to serve as the new master [21]. The sound quality from these derivations “range from very good to poor, depending on the quality of the sources, dedication and technical competence” [22]. When transferring the old 78s to CCDs, the old records were sometimes played at the incorrect speed, changing the tempo and pitch of the song. This article provides an especially clear example of the difference tempo change. Even with the renewed interest in tango music, much of the tango discography was in a sorry state.

This is where the heroes of our story come in. A small group of collectors maintained records in good condition, and another small group went about properly restoring and remastering. The tango world is both big and small—big in that you can go pretty much anywhere and find people dancing it; small in that there are only so many of us, so anywhere you go you run into some of the same people. The effort to restore tango music was no different. The people doing this work are spread around the world, but the total number is only a few dozen.

Restoring tango recordings is detailed and painstaking work involving numerous steps to collect, prepare, digitize, and process each individual track. Those interested can read more about the whole process here, here, and here. The result of all this labor, though, is that, through websites such as Tango Time Travel and Tango Tunes, milongas and festivals now get to play the tango greats as they were meant to be heard.

Restoration mid process. Image from https://tangotimetravel.be/method-of-restoration/


This restoration work means there are now often several versions of the same recording. Each version may have used different records for the transfer and different methods of cleaning and equalizing the song. There can be large differences in sound quality, and sometimes the ideal version to use varies depending on the venue, time of night, or mood being conveyed. These multiple versions compound with the fact that files can use different compression algorithms and come in different bitrates. Thus, a tango DJ may have several versions of a single recording. In this way, the discography of 14 thousand tangos, milongas, and valses can turn into a library several times this size.

What About Tango Music Today?

The full history of tango music has led us to a very special moment today. Hugely important and influential tango music from artists such as Astor Piazzolla and Horacio Salgán, along with continued output of the greats from the Golden age, were made well into the 60s, 70s, and 80s. As a whole, however, the tango music industry experienced several decades of decline. The number of tango orchestras, number of recordings, and number of opportunities for artists dwindled. Fortunately for us though, dwindling is not the same as vanishing.

We are at the start of a new golden age of tango music. On my last trip to Buenos Aires, I was struck by the number of live orchestras you could hear, and by the quality of sound coming from all of them. A generation of tango musicians were able to learn from the greats of the golden age, who were able to pass along their knowledge before passing away. And that generation is teaching a new generation of musicians. The quality of technique, sound, and artistry of tango music today is incredible and is continuing to grow.

The advancements in recording technology throughout the decades allow us to listen to music from more than 100 years of tango. The hard work of restoring and remastering means these songs sound better than ever before. And the continued artistry and creativity of contemporary tango musicians means new tangos to enjoy listening to and dancing two are coming out every year. There is no better time to be a tango dancer and tango music listener than today.

____________________________________________________

References

[1] https://jens-ingo.all2all.org/archives/882, https://historyofrecordingblog.wordpress.com/24-2/

https://www.el-recodo.com/lostrecordings-en?lang=en

[1] Archived cylinder recordings can be found at the UC Santa Barbra library  https://cylinders.library.ucsb.edu/.

[2] https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2010/oct/05/argentina-dance-tango-buenos-aires

[3] https://gearspace.com/board/mastering-forum/157797-please-we-need-help-form-experts.html


[1] https://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/27/arts/27soun.html

[2] https://www.loc.gov/collections/emile-berliner/articles-and-essays/gramophone/   


[1] https://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/27/arts/27soun.html

[2] https://www.loc.gov/collections/emile-berliner/articles-and-essays/gramophone/

[3] Archived cylinder recordings can be found at the UC Santa Barbra library  https://cylinders.library.ucsb.edu/.

[4] https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2010/oct/05/argentina-dance-tango-buenos-aires

[5] https://gearspace.com/board/mastering-forum/157797-please-we-need-help-form-experts.html

[6] https://www.el-recodo.com/lostrecordings-en?lang=en

[7] https://jens-ingo.all2all.org/archives/882, https://historyofrecordingblog.wordpress.com/24-2/

[8] https://www.todotango.com/english/history/chronicle/302/The-electric-recordings-and-a-marketing-trick/, https://www.tangomusicsecrets.co.uk/uncategorized/victor-electrical-1926/

[9] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_radio

[10] https://youtu.be/Wbx7Pn87uGQ?si=tj3NPrYLzYXED-cC

[11] From the Discography of Francisco Canaro https://sites.google.com/site/franciscocanarodiscography

[12] https://www.todotango.com/english/history/chronicle/4/DArienzo-Tango-has-three-things/

[13] https://www.tango-dj.at/index.htm

[14] https://blogs.telosalliance.com/the-history-of-magnetic-recording-tape

[15] http://jens-ingo.all2all.org/archives/2776 

[16] https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/rock-n-roll-and-military-dictatorships-almost-destroyed-argentine-tango

[17] https://humilitan.blogspot.com/2014/12/the-dark-ages-from-days-of-burned.html

[18] https://whyy.org/articles/encore-for-iconic-camden-recording-company-with-a-new-spin/

[19] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RCA_Records

[20] https://variety.com/2017/music/news/elvis-presley-archivist-ernst-jorgensen-interview-1202529943/

[21] http://www.totango.net/rca.html

[22] https://tangoteca.all2all.org/tango_sellos/index.html

Signal to Noise

I was recently fortunate to attend a series of workshops on sound engineering (Thank you Eric Heleno for the thought-provoking lectures and to James Oh for organizing an inspiring event). One concept discussed was the signal to noise ratio—keeping the sounds we want to hear while removing unwanted noise. Every cable, connection, mixer, and speaker can add noise or lose signal, and the final sound quality is only as good as the weakest link in this chain.

The workshops got me thinking that there is a similar chain of connections in our own body when we lead in tango. Just like the signal that passes from computer to speakers, our lead is a signal that passes through our body to be received by the follower. And similar to how FLAC files and expensive speakers can’t fix a faulty cable, our lead is only as clear as the weakest link in our internal chain.

So how can we have a high-fidelity lead? We lead through movement and muscle tone, and unwanted movement or muscle tone results in a noisy lead. Therefore, we want to go through each component in our internal chain and check if there is unnecessary movement or unneeded tension adding noise. I will share a useful way to segment the components of our internal chain, but it is just one way of many. It is the general process of looking component by component to remove unneeded movement or that matters.

We could consider each body part as the components and each joint as the connections. But for our purposes, it is useful to use a simpler framework. The four components I tend to consider are : (1) the legs, (2) the axis (hips, spine, and head), (3) the shoulder blades, and (4) the arms. We can imagine the signal path of our lead as passing from our feet, through our axis, shoulder blades, and arms, and being received in the embrace of our partner. Again, for each component we look at its movement (signal) and check if there is unneeded movement or tension (noise).

For the legs, we tend to not use the working leg enough and not release the free leg enough. Our working leg acts like an amplifier, so a weak working leg results in a weak signal. The axis consists of the hips, chest, and head stacked on top of each other. Our partner feels the movement of each of these blocks. Keeping the relative positions of the hip, chest, and head fixed (moving them the same amount) maintains a clear lead. And whenever they get out of alignment it adds noise to the lead. An unclear axis results in an unclear lead.

The signal of our lead passes from our axis to our partner through the shoulder blades. When the shoulder blades rise up on our back, it is like disconnecting an audio cable. All our partner hears is static. There is a triangle between the shoulders and our upper spine (picture the lines parallel to the floor). We want the spine vertex to be the point farthest from our partner, and we want to keep the shape of this triangle while dancing. Sometimes we step forward with our chest but leave the shoulder blades behind, or we move backwards with our shoulder blades without moving the spine; both cause the triangle to invert. The more this triangle moves, the more noise is added to the lead. The more stable the triangle of our spine to shoulders, the clearer the lead becomes.

Finally, the arms are a major source of noise as they easily move too much and/or become overly tense. Our partner tunes into how our arms move for indications of the lead. Our elbows and our partner’s spine form another triangle that is important to maintain to have a high-fidelity lead. Warping the triangle between your elbows and your partner’s spine adds unwanted noise to the lead. Whether we pivot, lead a turn, or step outside partner, we want to keep the shape of this triangle the same.

I have been using the connections of a sound system as an analogy for how to lead clearly. But they are actually part of the same chain. A chain that starts with what producer Rick Rubin calls ‘The Source’, passing through the minds of the songwriter and composer. Through the fingers of the musicians into the sounds that are recorded, copied, digitized, and eventually downloaded onto the DJ’s computer. From the audio file through cables, DAC, mixer, and speakers to the sound waves picked up by our ears and processed by our brain. Our brain takes these audio inputs and comes up with movements that are passed through our body to form the lead, which, along with the music, is interpreted by the follower to produce movements in the dance. This dance connects into the feeling and flow of the milonga, which in turn connects to the state of being of the participants, which trickles out and feeds into the whole world. When we dance, we are a conduit from the original Source into the world. The quality of the signal that we pass on, and whether we pass on signal or just noise, depends on us.

How do I lead?

The question most frequently asked to tango teachers is, “How do I lead this?” Trying to not disappoint, we come up with an assortment of plausible-sounding answers. Lead with your chest, with the tone of your embrace, with the pressure in your fingers. Use your hips, your disassociation, the floor, your intention, your axis. Focus on your connection, on your breath…use and focus on everything! But is asking how to lead is the wrong question?

The solution is often not a matter of how but a matter of when. Leading has many connotations, but its fundamental meaning is simply to be before. At its core, leading is a matter of timing. When we lead early enough, we can have a clear lead without using much force. Changing the timing of a lead is often sufficient to change a move from not working to working every time.

Do we have a clear idea of what we are leading? Or did we have a vague muddled idea and then hope for the best? Good tango followers are the closest anyone gets to mind readers. A clear image of a movement is enough for them to understand—a clear what becomes the how.

What is the setup and geometry of the step? Where precisely do we step and does our partner step? Is there enough room for the move to fit? Often, when a student asks “How do I lead this,” the real question is, “How do I force this movement to fit even though the geometry is incorrect?” We can give tips, tricks, and hacks on how to force the move to work anyways, and the student may even then leave feeling they learned something valuable. Or we can take the time to explain where to step such that the movement fits in the first place.

The why of a lead is how the movement captures a particular section of the music, completes a melodic phrase, fits within a thematic idea, or refers back to a previous sequence. A movements with a clear why is infinitely easier to interpret and follow than a nonsensical movement without context. The why is at least as important as the how, for he who has a why to lead can use almost any how.

It can be uncomfortable to focus on questions other than how. How is what students ask us about, and answering it makes us sound wise. Changing the question to when, what, where, or why makes us sound like we are dodging the question and don’t know. But here is my truth. I don’t know how my body signals a lead, and my best guess is that it is many things at once. I focus very little on how exactly the lead is signaled. Instead, I focus on when, making sure I lead early enough; I focus on what, having clear mental images and making clear choices about what I am leading; I focus on where, studying the geometry of the movements; and I focus on why, trying to choose movements that fit within the music and the thematic ideas we develop. The when, what, where, and why are how I lead.

Where Everything’s Made Up and the Points Don’t Matter

My tango games started from the first embrace. They began with the simple game of ‘Let’s find out!’. ‘If I step forward with my left foot, will I step on my partner? Let’s find out!’ ‘Will they be willing to dance with me even though I don’t know anything? Let’s find out!’ ‘Will I want to keep doing this dance? Let’s find out!’

I soon moved on to the Argentine version of a Chinese finger trap. ‘I got myself into these front ochos, surely I can figure out how to get myself out damn it!’ Each puzzle solved opened a door to ten more. First it was ‘can you remember these eight steps.’ Which turned into eight individual steps linking together in any order I wanted. ‘But can you do it in the reverse order?’  ‘How about on the other side?’ ‘But how about you lead doing the follower steps and they follow doing the leader steps?’ ‘But can you lead the reverse roles on the other side in reverse order?’  

I always had an appreciation for the sequence-based games. Show me a weird twirling whirling wrap and I’ll be entertained for hours. How many steps can I remember at once, and how quickly can I remember them? Class sequences are scored like golf. Each time you see the sequence is a stroke. Can you remember the full sequence in under par, or will you just putt along to a double bogey? You raise the stakes by putting the new move in at the milonga. How about double down and use a move you just learned in a performance?    

As I progressed in the dance, the games progressed too. ‘Can I dance with someone?’ turned into ‘can I dance every tanda?’ Which morphed into ‘can I dance every tanda with only people I really want to dance with?’ An unfortunate twist came when someone asked if I wanted a second tanda. Game on! Now it was ‘how many second tandas can I get?’ This complicates the rules for scoring far too much. Four or more two-tanda partners in a night, friggen’ Yahtzee! Someone says thank you a little too quickly after the last song ends, best take some lessons noob. But how much is one tanda each night worth compared to two tandas one night but then no tandas the next night? One tanda the first night and two the next night feels great, but somehow two the first night and one the next night feels like game over, you lose. If I can’t keep track of the points, then how can I tell if I am progressing? And if I don’t know if I am progressing, then how can I judge my self-worth?

I eventually discovered that at tango events seems to be music playing in the background. I never noticed it before, but as long as they keep playing it I may as well play some games which incorporate it. I played Red Light Green Light with the end of the phrase and the start of the next. I tried coloring between the lines to the different shades of the music. Did you know there are even rhythms other than the half notes? I started playing Pokémon with the syncopations: ‘gotta catch em all.’ Sometimes I would study a few songs at a time playing on repeat for a few days until I could tap each rhythm and follow each instrument. The easy part is getting the music in there, the hard part is how to get my body to send it back out.

The game I now play is to find the games within the game. Each game has its own rules, but the rules are made up anyways so it’s ok to break them. The games change throughout the night, vary by partner and by tanda, and several games are played within one song. Each has its own way to get points, and choosing the right game at the right time gives a turbo boost, but points don’t matter either so don’t worry too much about trying to get a high score.

Maybe I start with a ‘snuggly embrace’ game. No points for steps, but points for how nice it feels and bonus if you can breathe together to the music. Maybe move on to tango target practice. Fifty cents gets you three steps for the full phrase, so choose your targets wisely. Place all three at well-timed moments in the music and you win the big fluffy teddy bear. I start to switch between walking and turns (you can be the Bouba to my Kiki). I leave open the space for the ‘catch the piano fills’ games too. Just single player mode for the moment, but maybe I’ll join for a coop adventure later in the song.

We change to a ‘build your own sequence’ real-time strategy. What you build changes for each level of the game. Maybe this level only allows cross-system sacadas, or maybe the level does not allow the lead to take any steps. Maybe the sequence is already built from the last workshop you took but the game is fitting it into the teeny tiny space available. Maybe it is a custom level of your own creation.

The points don’t matter, but there are a few combos that can rack up the score. Well-placed repetitions score highly. Extra if you bring in compositional ideas like augmentation, diminution, ornamentation, retrograde, among others. Complex moves should be saved for the right moment. A hard move in the wrong place counts for little but stick the landing with a really cool move at the right time and it’s tens across the board. Unlock the 2x tricky bonus if you finish your flourish and the switch back to the snuggly embrace game at the same time the musical theme repeats. How do we choose the game to play? Everyone has a few they especially like, whether they know they are playing or not. The music has a voice in the choice. Our partner even more so. Sometimes I pick the game. Sometimes my partner chooses. Sometimes we come up with the game together. Next time we dance I wonder what games we will create?

Tango Relativity: Finding your Reference Frame

We express ourselves in dance through movement and stillness. Having clear descriptions of motion supports our growth as dancers and dance instructors. Since Einstein, physicists have realized that all motion is relative, and its description depends on the frame of reference. When it comes to dance, what are the reference frames we can describe movement relative to?

There are three reference frames we can speak from. We can speak of movement relative to 1) the space, 2) our partner, and 3) another part of our body. When we take a sidestep together, our hands move relative to space but stay fixed relative to our partner and our torso. While pivoting, we may have our hips move relative to our torso while our torso stays fixed in space. Each frame of reference provides unique insights, and understanding a movement relative to all three reference points provides a fuller understanding of the dance.

Most movements have an invariance, where one of the reference frames remains fixed throughout the motion. Finding the invariance is especially useful for understanding a movement. It is much easier to keep something fixed than to know how much to move, especially when the size of step or rotation changes. Often, the invariance is in the embrace, providing an oasis of calm for our partner as we move in space. A volcada, for example, has the invariance in our own body where we keep our own alignment while tilting. With dynamics such as compressions and elastic movements, we tend to keep a point fixed in space that our partners and ourselves both move relative to.  

The three reference points help us communicate better, both as a teacher and as a student. Seemingly contradictory advice is often actually the same advice from different reference frames. Our arms sometimes have to move more in space to be able to provide a still embrace relative to our partner. One teacher may tell us to move our arms more, and another tells us to move our arms less, but they are both giving the same feedback just from different reference frames.

Feedback from our partner is often about what they are feeling, which coincides with how we are moving relative to their body. When a teacher shows us a new move, the advice is often how we move our body relative to ourselves. Comments from outside observers tend to be about how we move in space. Each type of feedback gives a new perspective. Seek out information from all three reference frames and then combine them to a fuller understanding of the dance.  

Project, Push, Plant, Pull, and Possibly Pivot

What are the components of a step in tango? Of course there are many ways to step, and no person will move the same as another. And it would be too much to even enumerate the intricate joint and muscle movements that occur when we move, to say nothing of understanding or teaching such nuances. But is there a general high-level framework we can use to think about our movements to help teach and understand the broader concepts involved? Something that could help us be able to be more comfortable, connected, and creative, and minimize loss of balance and disconnection?

Here is a framework I have been teaching and using in my own dance which I find useful and seems to produce positive results in our students. I call it the 5 P’s of tango movement. Movements are broken into five sub-components:

  1. Project – extend the free leg while maintaining balance on the standing leg.
  2. Push – muscles of the standing leg propel us beyond our projection.
  3. Plant – free leg stops moving and provides a counter-force to control our movement
  4. Pull – muscles of the new standing leg work to pull our axis towards it  
  5. Possibly Pivot – depending on the next movement, we may pivot before the next projection

These components are of course not concepts I developed, instead drawing heavily on the knowledge of teachers and colleagues who have studied the dance more deeply than myself and have been generous to share their insights. I only hope that this specific framing of project, push, plant, pull, and possibly pivot can provide some small addition to the understanding of tango movement and teaching pedagogy.

The five P’s help us understand the pieces of movements that can practice to gain control over, and helps us diagnose challenges we often encounter in the dance. One common challenge occurs is when we push without any projection. When done unintentionally, this results in making both ourselves and our partner feel rushed. Another common challenge is maintaining balance throughout the step. This is largely a matter of planting and pulling to control the transfer of weight. If you find yourself losing balance in your steps, consider focusing your attention on planting the free leg and then using it to pull yourself onto the new axis.

We often struggle maintaining balance when pivoting. This usually occurs because we do not separate the pulling and pivoting portions. Though it may sound counterintuitive, if you find yourself losing balance in pivots, try delaying when you start pivoting so that you have more time to complete the pull. Similarly, delaying when we start the next projection helps us succeed in movements such as back sacadas.

Much of the time we perform all five in the stated order, but removing one component or changing the order can give new variations and flavors to the dance. A lapiz, for example, can be thought of as adding a pivot after a projection. We can also give each P a different amount of time or intensity. A small amount of pulling will bring our axis over the new leg while additional pulling will bring our new free leg to collection. Giving some components more or less weight results in different styles and effects. In general, gaining control over each P and being able to fluidly connect them provides a great deal of control and possibilities for creativity.

Basics are not Just for Beginners: A taxonomy of tango classes

I recently took a series of workshops with Jonathan and Clarisa. The Friday classes were a “Seminar on the Basics” while the Saturday and Sunday classes covered the more advanced topic of changes of dynamics. Something I found interesting was, while the Saturday and Sunday classes were completely booked, noticeably less people attended Friday. Talking with some people about this, they mentioned they thought a class focusing on basics was meant for more beginner dancers, so they waited to take the advanced seminars. Is a basics class a beginner class, or are they different? What are the different types of classes and who are they for? And what does class level mean?

Here is a taxonomy I developed which I find useful for both understanding the different types of classes and for when I design my own classes. Classes can be broken down into topics, where a topic denotes a move, technique point, musical concept, drill, or really any distinct component. Topics can be simple or complex, with complex topics being more challenging to do successfully. Classes can cover a few simple topics, many simple topics, a few complex topics, or many complex topics.

A back sacada is more complex than an ocho because there are more potential points of failure with a back sacada than with leading or following an ocho. But this does not mean one is easier than the other. What separates simple from complex topics is less the challenge on the high end and more of the chance of failure on the low end. We can make even the simplest step very challenging by adding enough detail. In fact, perhaps the most impressive thing someone can do in tango is a simple movement with exquisite detail. The fidelity that each topic is covered is another dimension of classes. Walking may be as simple as putting one foot in front of the other (low fidelity). It can also be very high fidelity with posture, connection, muscles, joint mechanics, and timing. Thus, we have a taxonomy of eight potential types of classes, as shown in the table below.  

 Low FidelityHigh Fidelity
Few simple topicsBeginner ClassFundamentals Class
Many simple topicsIntermediate ClassX
Few complex topicsXAdvanced Class
Many complex topicsMaster ClassX

Beginner classes cover the basics, going over a few simple topics in light detail to give new dancers a chance for success. Fundamentals classes similarly covers basics but do so in high fidelity. Beginner classes are not fundamentals classes and fundamentals are not just for beginners. Unfortunately, tango commonly combines beginner and fundamentals classes, leading to new dancers feeling overwhelmed and more experienced dancers having critical gaps in their knowledge base.

Intermediate classes teach how to string sequences together and layer topics such as navigation and musicality to the movements. The challenge comes not from the individual steps or details, more from the combination of factors. Advanced classes actually cover less topics but cover more difficult topics in more detail. Master classes combine complex topics to show new possibilities, highlight areas for improvement, and help break out of old patterns. The different classes serve different purposes, and the level of a class does not coincide with the level of dancer that should take the class. Someone dancing for less than a year can get a lot of benefit from an intermediate or advanced class, and fundamentals classes are valuable at all stages of development.

So, what do the big X marks in the table represent? In the movie The Prince’s Bride, the protagonist is imprisoned in ‘The Pit of Despair’, a torture chamber where his lifeforce is slowly sucked away. This seems a rather fitting description of a bad tango class. The three X’s mark tango class pits of despair to be avoided at all cost.

We have two guides which indicate where the pits of despair lie. The first is the ratio of walking to talking. Take the class time spent doing divided by the class time where the teacher is talking. If the walking-to-talking ratio is below one, there is a good chance the class is falling into a pit of despair. The second guide is the success ratio, which is the number of times students succeed divided by the number of times they. A low success ratio leads to frustration and scares students away from the topic.    

Classes are like maps in that there is a limited amount of information which can be presented. You can’t show a large area in detail on a map; nor can you teach many topics in high fidelity. If you try, then you end up talking more than doing and you end up torturing more than teaching. Complex topics also need sufficient detail for a decent success ratio. You can gloss over a lot of the nuances of a sidestep and still have beginner dancers successfully lead and follow one. Gloss over the details while teaching leader ganchos and your students are in for a different experience. Master classes can get away with teaching complex topics in low fidelity because they assume the students already have some level of mastery of the individual elements.

Something interesting about the Jonathan and Clarissa workshops was that the Friday class on the basics ended up being the most useful. As we can now see, they were not beginner classes, but fundamentals classes, which laid the structure for the rest of the weekend.

Bricks and Branches: Considering our Analogies of Learning

Analogies structure how we understand the world, mapping what we know onto what we want to discover. An apt analogy guides our path forward and highlights pitfalls to avoid, while an inappropriate analogy leaves us lost. What analogies do we use to conceptualize learning? And are they apt or do they mislead us?

We liken learning to constructing a skyscraper. Teachers give us “a solid foundation” and we “build from the ground up.” We discuss “levels” of difficulty and “levels” of proficiency. While the skyscraper analogy is common, it is inappropriate. My thesis is that a more apt analogy is that our learning and development can be best compared with how a tree grows.

Skyscraper construction starts at the foundation and builds upwards. The foundation needs to be rock solid before adding on top of it or the whole structure will be unstable. A flaw in one level requires everything above to be torn down and rebuilt. Once a level is built, you move on to the next floor. Levels also have a hierarchy, with each new floor considered more prestigious than the ones below it.

The skyscraper analogy to learning implies movements and concepts are either 1) at our current level, 2) above us (too hard), or 3) below us (too easy). Under the skyscraper analogy, if a student wants to learn a back sacada but doesn’t have a perfect pivot, then we tell them they need to wait until they have a more solid foundation. Once we can do boleos and ganchos, then a class on walking and ochos is clearly too low of a level for us. When we take a private and the instructor points out a flaw in our technique, then we are devastated because we have to tear everything down and start from square one. Viewing learning like constructing a building means we don’t practice concepts and movements that are at a level we think is above us, and we don’t revisit concepts and movements that are below us.  

Contrast this with how a tree grows. A small seed that sprouts into a sapling, spreading its roots, trunk, branches, and leaves. Growth occurs simultaneously downwards, outwards, and upwards. Even the smallest sapling has leaves reaching towards the sun, and even the largest oak continues growing roots. Each year the trunk adds a new ring, and every part of the tree is equally important to its health and growth.

Embracing the tree analogy guides us in a different direction to how we approach learning. Novel and complex movements feed our creativity while also motivating us to continue growing our roots and trunk (our fundamentals). We think of lessons less in terms of levels and more in terms of what new tree ring it adds to our dance. Imperfections are not a cause to tear down and restart, but instead signal for new branches that we can begin developing. Instead of avoiding feedback and what it tells us about our level, we seek information because it is the nutrients that allow our flowers to blossom. The learning process is no longer an imposing inanimate object but is instead an organic and ever-growing living thing.

Pollock’s Paradas: Abstraction as a means to lead more by leading less

I overheard a debate on leading quick side-steps:

“You lead them by rising up on your toes and pick your heels off the floor.” Said one

“I say It’s all about lifting your partner with your embrace.” Replied another

“No no no! It’s about rocking side to side to lead the weight changes!” Interjected a third

How to communicate with our partner in tango (as in life) is often a mystery. We look for clues and come up with all sorts of hypotheses. “Maybe I use my hand like a rudder on their back to lead pivots?” Or “let me try signaling the direction by leaning—tilt forwards to walk forward, tilt back to walk backwards.” Our teachers give us clues, and eventually we construct a theory of how the movements in our body signal leads to our partner. Good leaders are considered the ones who have clearer, subtler, and more comfortable signals.

The most common question asked in any tango class is “What do I do to lead this step?” This is a question of what the mechanics of communication are. Let us call the approach of translating body movements into leads the mechanical approach to leading. I do X, so you do Y. I turn my chest, so you pivot. I push the floor, so you step backwards. I place my leg here, so you do the gancho. But is this the correct approach? I want to share a concept I believe opens many new possibilities for communication and results in a calmer, clearer, more creative, and more comfortable lead.

The concept is what I call the abstract approach to leading. To ‘abstract’ something is to distill its essence by removing certain details to clarify other parts. We distill our lead to the essence of what clearly conveys the information while removing unnecessary details. We abstract our communication from our movement mechanics so that we can separate the lead from our own movement.

Say you want to lead three quick side-steps to catch a piano fill in the music (to take a specific example so that we can abstract concretely). Leading mechanically requires you to communicate the following: small side, collect, change weight, small side, collect, change weight, small side, pause. That is an awful lot to get across, especially in a short amount of time. No wonder there is so much confusion around how to communicate such movements. Instead of leading each movement, you can take a more abstract approach. Maybe lead the concept ‘quick sidesteps’ instead of leading each movement. Or you can lead the direction and instrument—piano, side. This communicates the same concept more succinctly.

By getting at the essence of communication, we can lead complex movements and concepts with simple movements in our own body. Using our arms to manipulate our partner into positions is replaced with transmitting an image of the effect. Asking for a larger step or bigger boleo by making a big movement in our own body to send more force into our partner is replaced with calmly conveying our interest in a change in intensity. When we abstract our lead, we reduce the amount of information that needs to be conveyed. The pivots, collections, and steps of the turn are replaced with a simple direction (turning clockwise or counterclockwise). Leading the timing of each step is replaced with signaling an instrument for the phrase. There is only so much bandwidth with which to communicate, so conveying the same information more succinctly allows us to communicate more.

A great way to practice leading abstractly is to lead the turn (forward, side, back, side, forward) and changes of direction without using your arms. You signal the direction and trust your partner to take care of the specifics of the timing, steps, pivots, and collections. The direction to go is the essence of what your partner needs. They spend a lot of time practicing their turn, so trying to lead each step tends to only get in their way. Pay special note of whether you move your arms when you change direction with a front or back ocho. Most people do, but it is largely unnecessary. Here you see the difference between leading mechanically and leading abstractly. With the former you move your partner with your arms to lead the pivot; with the latter, you ask for a change in direction and trust your partner to pivot.

Something else to practice is to see if you can convey images and concepts instead of steps. Instead of trying to figure out what in your body you need to do to lead a boleo, visualize what a nice boleo would look like and feel like. See the image as if you were a third person looking at your partnership from the outside. Many people find that once you have a clear image of what you are going for, then the information gets conveyed to their partner as if by magic. When our mind is clear, our body somehow knows how to efficiently convey information and we do not need nearly as much movement as we think we do to communicate clearly. You can also try conveying a musical phrase or instrument. A simple exercise is to be in an embrace and try conveying an instrument without taking any steps. Once your partner thinks they know which instrument you chose, they say it verbally. Then switch and see if you can feel which instrument they choose. The same game can be played for things like size of step, linear versus circular, energy, and emotions. We can convey a lot more than just steps through the embrace, and communicating with these more abstract concepts often makes the movements much easier to lead.    While I have discussed abstraction from the perspective of leading, the same concept applies to following. Moving our partner is backleading, but communicating ideas and intentions is co-creating. Communicating more abstractly also allows multiple ways to communicate the same ideas. This means the communication can change from partner to partner and can even change within the song. Leading abstractly can free us to do and experience more in the dance. Instead of trying to lead every detail, we just lead what is necessary for our partner to understand. We distill our lead to what is really needed to convey information instead of what is needed to move our partner. This allows space to feel more, observe more, and allows us have a true conversation with our partner.